Top Crypto News – 19/12/2017

Hedge Fund Pro Miller Is ’50 Percent’ Invested in Bitcoin


Investor Bill Miller said last week that his MVP1 hedge fund has half of its investments in bitcoin.

Miller, the chairman and chief investment officer at Miller Valued Partners, made the disclosure on Dec. 13 when speaking to WealthTrack podcast with Consuelo Mack.

“It’s just about 50 percent right now,” the legendary hedge fund manager was quoted as saying, who added that the fund also holds bitcoin cash. Miller’s involvement in bitcoin dates back several years when he bought stakes in 2013 and 2014 (at a claimed average cost of $350 apiece).

In October this year, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal, bitcoin was said to have comprised one-third of Miller’s hedge fund, meaning that the manager has only boosted the stake size since then. At first, according to Miller, just 5% of the fund had been allocated to bitcoin.

And as of October, the value of the MVP1 fund was pegged at $154 million, and Miller Value Partners reported having more than $2 billion in assets under management as of September.

In the podcast, Miller took aim at those who have criticized the cryptocurrency, including billionaire investor Warren Buffet – who Miller called “wrong” about bitcoin back in 2014 – and JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who infamously declared bitcoin a “fraud” earlier this year.

According to Miller, neither of them had fully thought the topic through.

“I’m highly confident to say that not one of them had actually studied it carefully,” he said during the podcast. “That is to say, they have strong opinions about something they haven’t really looked at.”

His comments come after weeks of escalating bitcoin prices, which at press time are trading at around $18,695, according to CoinDesk’s Bitcoin Price Index (BPI).

At the same time, subtle changes could be coming next for Miller’s bitcoin-heavy hedge fund. Miller suggested during the podcast that his firm is looking at ways to decrease the amount of cryptocurrency it holds without having to sell any of the holdings.

“I’d be fairly confident to say it won’t be 50% of the fund for that much longer, which does not mean necessarily we are going to sell it,” Miller explained, adding:

“We are working on how to handle it without selling it.”

Image via WealthTrack/YouTube
Written by CoinDesk


2018 for ICOs: A Quarter-By-Quarter Outlook


As specialists in the ICO market, we assist our clients in optimizing the execution of their ICOs, and understanding the constantly shifting state of crypto capital markets is no small part of that exercise.

Looking back, 2017 was wild ride, with huge contrasts between some predictable developments (such as the move towards ATS exchanges and security tokens) and less predictable patches (resulting from deal fatigue and forks). It must be said that although certainty in any market is impossible, the ever-changing world of crypto creates unique challenges for forecasting.

Successfully running ICOs this year involved constantly trimming sails and adjusting to rapidly changing market expectations. ICOs being a very young capital market, I don’t see next year being any different.

I am however bullish about the ICO market long term as a funding mechanism for emerging growth companies akin to the role of high-yield debt for public companies, and that’s the direction we have focused on (it’s not an accident that the offering memorandums for BCAP, Science, and Protos resemble that of a high-yield debt instrument).

Contrary to many in the ICO world, I do continue to see an active and important role for venture capital and incubator firms for seed and early rounds. Early-stage companies benefit from the guidance and connections provided, which balances the relative cost startups pay for the investment.

However, I do suspect that we will see ICOs take the place of Series B and Series C rounds onwards. I think the days of the late-stage VCs are numbered, or at the very least the number that are highly successful is likely to dwindle.  The ICO market is here to stay, with the more relevant question being what is likely to sell, as each quarter of this year has been distinctly different, with rapidly shifting appetites and economic drivers.

At a high level these are my thoughts for 2018:


Although November 2017 did see an all-time monthly high of $743 million for ICOs, this funding was highly concentrated to specific deals and the overall extraordinary volume of deals in the market made it difficult for high-quality deals to stand out compared to previous quarters. As a result, per-deal data weakened slightly as the number of ICOs in the month increased ~50% over the month prior.

I think we will continue to see this trend continue into Q1 2018 – the overall market is likely to remain challenging as the volume glut works itself out.

Volatility in bitcoin, which we tend to see at the start of the year for a variety of factors including what has become an annual trend for people in the People’s Republic of China to sell down ahead of the world’s largest human migration, the Chinese New Year holiday, will also be a consideration.

We do also expect the current ferocious pace of investigative activities by Canadian and U.S. securities regulators to continue; this isn’t getting a lot of press to date, but has been extensive.

We also expect there to be one or more significant U.S. enforcement cases, including potentially one or more of the cryptocurrency exchanges before the end of 2017 or at least by the end of 2018. Again, that is likely to have a chilling effect on the volume of the market, albeit one I think is long overdue.

I remain stunned that the SEC report on the DAO seems to have had absolutely no impact on the pace of ICOs, nor on the structure in which many have been run during 2017.

It was a wonderful piece of very detailed guidance on the views of the SEC. Other than their position on app and utility tokens trading on the exchanges, I am very surprised that more ICOs have not incorporated this guidance into their ICO process and documents. I believe this has change in the near term and the reaction will be swift following any high-profile enforcements.


For Q2, I think the two big questions will be the price of BTC and ETH and whether any alternative trading systems (ATS) will be up and running and trading security tokens.

BTC is continuing to climb at a ferocious pace, and I don’t think it is too much of a stretch to say that BTC is likely to hit $50,000 at some point during the middle of next year, although where ETH, or BCH for that matter, will be is anyone’s guess.

A high BTC price can be both a driver and a dampener on ICO activity; people feel the need to diversify and feel buoyant and positive about purchasing ICOs, but at the same time, expect ICOs to be providing the same “return” that BTC is. This creates an opportunity cost problem with BTC, when it more than doubles in value in a single quarter as it has in Q4 2017.

There are additional impacts that good ICO advisors have to respond to quickly, for example, a high BTC price forces ICOs to make concessions such as pricing in US dollars at the close of an ICO or at the close of any private or discounted sale. A high BTC price also encourages app and utility token ICOs to strain at what are viewed as the current securities law guardrails, resulting in what I suspect will be yet another active quarter for enforcement.

Security tokens are an ideal solution to the issues of a high BTC price and a strong enforcement environment, as they can legally promise a return and can genuinely offer a diversification from BTC and ETH. We are bullish that security tokens will eventually form the majority of the high-quality issuance volume within the ICO market. The key of course is trading them and that requires an ATS or for the security token to be registered with the SEC on an S1 or a Form A+ and to be trading on a nationally recognized exchange like NASDAQ or NYSE.

The challenge to date is to get an ATS with a specific license able to trade digital securities – and we see several lining up to be available in Q1 or at the latest Q2.

I do also remain bullish that Regulation A+ is an ideal match for ICOs, particularly it’s relatively low access threshold for investors (the greater of 10 percent of net worth or income, self-certified) compared to the accredited investor certification necessary for Regulation D/506 offerings.

However, because 26 U.S. Code § 1032 only recognizes a capital raise strictly through a stock sale, ICOs proceeds of US issuer have to be taxed as revenue, and unless there’s operating costs or net operating losses to offset that makes the raise incredibly expensive when you add on the high cost of legal and other specialist advice or an ICO versus a conventional raise.


Now we really are at the point of crystal ball gazing. Generally speaking by this point we expect several ATS licensed to trade security tokens to be up and running in the U.S., and we expect the smart holders of BTC and ETH to pivot a significant part of their portfolio to security tokens.

Again, what we are anticipating by this time is a global regulatory response which will underline issuer and investor decision-making.

Laugh as you may, but we do expect the Burning Man festival to yet again have a significant slowdown impact for August: the digital token and cryptocurrency market has not historically had the traditional ECM blackouts, but it does have a few specific ones and Burning Man is probably the most significant because so many market participants attend.


Frankly, Q4 is anyone’s guess.

Written by CoinDesk


Korean cryptocurrency exchange to close after second hacking in a year

bitcoin (1)

A South Korean cryptocurrency exchange is to file for bankruptcy after it was hacked for the second time this year, highlighting concerns about security amid booming trade in bitcoin and other virtual currencies.

The exchange, called Youbit, had been hacked once before in April when nearly 4,000 bitcoins were stolen in a cyber-attack that the country’s spy agency linked to North Korea, according to a recent South Korean newspaper report.

Youbit announced on its website on Tuesday that it had been hacked at 4.35am local time, causing a loss worth 17% of its total assets.

It did not elaborate on the amount, but said all customers’ cryptocurrency assets would be marked down to 75% of their value. It added that it had stopped trading and would work to minimise customer losses.

Bitcoin traded at around $18,800 on Tuesday morning. It made its debut on the world’s largest futures exchange on Sunday evening, when the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) became the second exchange to offer bitcoin derivatives trading.

The January 2018 contract initially spiked above $20,000 but later dropped back, having been originally priced at $19,500.

But its debut was overshadowed by a series of warnings from politicians and others about the digital currency.

Axel Weber, chairman of the Swiss bank UBS, warned anyone keen to invest in bitcoin that they risked losing their money. He said: “We as a bank have consciously warned against this product because we do not assess it to be valuable or sustainable.”

Denmark’s top central banker later weighed in, saying people buying bitcoin should not blame regulators if they suffered losses when the market crashed because it was an unregulated market. He said putting money into bitcoin was basically gambling.

Youbit is a smaller player in South Korea’s cryptocurrency market, while the world’s busiest cryptocurrency exchange Bithumb accounts for about 70% of the country’s market share.

An official at Korea Internet & Security Agency (KISA), the state agency that responds to cyber-attacks, said the police and KISA officials were starting an investigation into the hacking.

It is the second hacking within a fortnight. Nearly $64m of bitcoin was stolen by hackers who broke into the Slovenian-based bitcoin mining marketplace NiceHash. The hack was “a highly professional attack with sophisticated social engineering” that resulted in approximately 4,700 bitcoin being stolen, worth about $63.92m at current prices, said NiceHash’s head of marketing, Andrej P Škraba.

Bitcoin exchanges and wallets have a history of being targeted, and security experts say they become more vulnerable to cybercrime as valuations rise.

Written by the Guardian CEO: Central Banks Will Hold Crypto In Reserve In 2018



In 2018 central banks will hold cryptocurrency, alongside gold and foreign currencies, according to the CEO of, Peter Smith.

Speaking in a short interview on CNBC’s Coin Rush segment, Smith forecast that next year would see the first such incorporations of crypto into traditional financial institutions, saying:

“I think this year will be the first year we start to see central banks start to hold digital currencies as part of their balance sheet.”

2018 will be the year that central banks hold digital currencies: Blockchain CEO from CNBC.

Bitcoin’s rapid rise this year, from around $1,000 in January to $20,000 this week, has attracted the attention of banks, governments and regulators globally. In some markets banks specifically have adopted varying and sometimes polarizing, views on the cryptocurrency’s future.

While South Korea’s Shinhan announced it would become the first major bank to offer customers Bitcoin wallets and storage, the Governor of Denmark’s central bank this week described Bitcoin as “deadly” and urged citizens to stay away from it.

As a trend, Smith continued, central banks would likely begin to issue their own branded digital assets “either late this year or early next year.” Multiple governments, including Russia’s, are considering issuing a national digital currency, and Dubai has already officially decided to do so.

During the interview, when quizzed about the likelihood of a “major hack” occurring in the crypto space in the future, Smith said that since it had been around five months since the last major hack, the ecosystem was “due for one in the next month or two.” Speaking of his own company, he told CNBC:

“We’ve been one of the biggest targets for a long time; it keeps you busy.”

Written by CoinTelegraph

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s